🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass functions where Black people are paid to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The tide has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the month is observed is a reflection of the political moment. How it progresses is a good lesson in how co-option leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the European continent as a entirety.

In the America, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A campaign to scrub Black history and experience from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the month represents how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the conditions of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out across all seasons (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Organizations who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and alertness to minor insults, but challenged by the threats that impact society if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.